admin

I have a high regard for those souls who have made it their purpose to serve the rest of humanity, sometimes at the cost of their own lives, whether they be nuns, monks, crusaders, martyrs, soldiers, or heroes. It’s not easy to resist the temptations of the world for more selfless pursuits.  It takes a principled character and extraordinary compassion to forgo marriage, material possessions, and sensory pleasures to lead an austere and solitary life pursuing one’s mission.  (Or you can just be poor and single because you’re really bad at entrepreneurship AND relationships, but I’ll save that story for my memoir.)

I’ve often wondered if these charitable and enlightened souls had access to some kind of wisdom or celestial connection that the rest of us haven’t experienced. Many spiritual leaders give off that impression via their unusually peaceful and detached demeanors and singular devotion to their faith. When I was younger, I used to believe that these icons were infallible and divine, that they had some kind of mysterious, otherworldly relationship with the universe that enabled them to be so brave and exemplary.  Like Superman, but . . .  in saffron robes.   They were Saffronman!

Or like in a Bollywood movie where there would be only angelic heroes or devilish villains.  The world was more binary to me back then.  I believed that there were already liberated souls temporarily here on earth to impart to us mere mortals as much as they could of their own knowledge and perfection before they left for their final heavenly abode.  And then there was the rest of us, fallible and ordinary. 

Dalai Lama Praying

However I’ve since realized that many, if not all of these idols are quite human as well, with at least a few vulnerabilities nestled amongst their many sterling virtues.  I’m not referring to pedophile priests hiding their perversions from the world under the guise of charity, or those forced to renounce the world for reasons other than their faith.  I’m referring to the flaws in those genuine role models who truly feel that service and renunciation is or was their calling – from the Dalai Lama to Mother Theresa to other noble figures.

The current Dalai Lama was supposed to have been chosen by divine guidance.  And he has certainly pursued a selfless and philanthropic lifestyle from birth to his current age of 80 plus.  But though he is kind, intelligent, open-minded, and a visionary in so many ways, he does seem to have a few shortcomings that caught me by surprise when I learned of them.  

His past comments on the necessity for any future female Dalai Lama to be attractive in order to be taken seriously, and some of his anti-immigrant sentiments have offended quite a few people who have heard them. His team has claimed that the misunderstandings were due to cultural or language differences and he was simply being humorous.  I can’t seem to swallow that explanation based on the videos I’ve seen of the incidents, and neither could many others – there was alot of Lama drama around all this.  But I believe these faux pas can be forgiven since we know the Dalai Lama to be a humane and service minded soul in the greater context of his life.  Nevertheless, his questionable statements made me change my perception of him from a spirit that was divinely handed to us by the universe to, instead, an ordinary but well-intentioned human simply doing his best with the remarkable role given to him.

What further caused my opinions to change was learning of the Dalai Lama’s diet as a non-vegetarian.  (Before I go further, I’ll first admit that this is a case of do as I say, and not as I do.  Like parents who sneak in cheeseburgers while telling their kids to eat veggies.)  I have tried numerous times but have not managed to stop eating meat myself, for health and convenience reasons, although I greatly admire and hope to be a vegan, and am slowly trying to reduce my consumption.  I continue to feel guilty about it every single day.  I try my best not to wear or buy animal products when I can.  Yet I do not fully abstain from consuming animal products overall.

So it might seem hypocritical of me to point fingers.  But I like my monks immaculate.  For someone with the Dalai Lama’s resources and devotion to alleviating suffering in the world, I just cannot fathom how he – and apparently many other Tibetan monks – can eat meat. I thought he was supposed to be a role model for the rest of us.  What’s worse is he doesn’t seem to be very apologetic about it, nor does he seem to aspire to reduce his non-vegetarian consumption.  I don’t buy the excuse that they must beg for their food and can’t inconvenience their benefactors, or that they don’t eat animals specifically killed in their name.  Cruelty is cruelty, and this criticism applies as equally to me as it does the monks.

Again, I don’t dismiss the Dalai Lama’s many other strengths and good deeds, there are more of those than the few cracks that surface here and there.  The Dalai Lama leads an ascetic life where he could easily live a life of plenty – he follows most of his own teachings.  But these revelations about him did startle me into the dawning realization that many of my revered spiritual idols may be mere mortals with their own flaws.

Mother Theresa is another iconic and compassionate leader whom I greatly admire, even years after her passing. No one can deny that she spent a lifetime in benevolent servitude of others.  She also seemed to live a rather simple and pious life.

However there are many accounts of how she would allow her patients to experience pain, in the belief that suffering was virtuous, even when there were painkillers or other means to lessen it. She was also accused of having attempted the conversion of many of her wards to her brand of Catholicism.  Though perhaps this can be dismissed as her misguided conviction of there being only one true way to reach God, even so, I can’t help but think that a truly enlightened soul would be open to any path to heaven.

In addition, the infamous doubts that Mother Theresa conveyed in her letters to peers – letters which she did not want public and had wanted destroyed – revealed that she was not sure there was a God, that she had never spoken to him on her own. She greatly struggled with constant internal turmoil in this regard. I have no issues with this, it’s completely understandable and, in fact, relatable that she had no secret mystical connections. But where I do feel confused is her desire to hide this from the public and display a different front in terms of her beliefs. Why put on such a staunch devotional show on the outside – to the point of wanting others to convert to a specific religion – if one is so unsure of it on the inside?  For these reasons I have issues with her, or anyone, being officially accepted as a saint, since that term implies an angelic, and otherworldly persona that I have come to understand that no one really has.  It can be misleading.  She was as close to a saint as we might get, no doubt, but she was not without her faults as well.

While growing up I was affiliated with an international religious organization where I attended occasional summer camps and Sunday school classes.  I met many of the swamis from that organization who would visit our ashram in Chicago as they made their way around the world on their tours. Many of these swamis, akin to monks, had renounced worldly ties and relationships from a very early age, and were leading a spartan, celibate, and service-based life. But when passing through our locality, a few of them would exhibit typical human qualities – albeit somewhat diluted – of anger, bias, intolerance, or pettiness. 

On one occasion I remember my Mom had cooked lunch for a swamiji at our home, since it was our community’s responsibility to feed the swamis who did not cook themselves.  (I pretended to help by fluttering about here and there while importantly waving around various kitchen implements.)  This particular swamiji had a solid reputation in the community but nevertheless he exhibited alot of idiosyncrasies and fussy preferences that were at odds with someone supposed to be so removed from the material world.  He was a good and kind soul overall and practicing a much more charitable life than the rest of us, but he did have his share of shortcomings.

Note:  Another swamiji – who was the founder of this same organization – has since passed away, but from what little I knew of him when he was alive, and from his remaining videos and publishings, he did seem to be someone who was unflinchingly principled and noble in every aspect.  But sadly I didn’t have a chance to meet him as often as I would have liked and make a determination either way.

So is it possible that I am mistaken and there breathe unblemished, divine godmen who have reached the pinnacle of consciousness and are only here for a brief stay on their way out?  Is it possible that there exist creatures in our world who have some kind of special access to the secrets of the universe which we everyday mortals have yet to glimpse?  Is there somewhere, out there, a Mork to our Mindy?

Perhaps – I have barely connected with a handful of spiritual teachers in my lifetime and have not interacted with a huge sample size. But increasingly I believe it is not likely. From the clues that I have gleaned from some of the most respected leaders in this regard, there exist souls who have evolved and reached some of the highest peaks of self-realization, but they appear to be flawed and human in the end, just like the rest of us.

In some ways, however, that may make these beings worthy of even MORE admiration.  The fact that they are vulnerable to doubts or weaknesses yet still manage to live such exemplary lives is the part that is extraordinary.  Having imperfections and still being able to inspire impressions of divinity or sainthood is not easily accomplished by just anyone.  How many of us are willing to do what they do?  Credit must be given where it is due.

Still, there is a part of me that would have loved the comfort and hope that would have come from knowing there were souls that had managed to reach absolute and complete enlightenment.  It would have offered more certainty as to what lies ahead and the path that I might take to get there. But as reassuring as that would have been, just like Santa Claus and the Tooth Fairy, I would venture a guess that – on this planet at least – the perfect soul does not exist. 

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Comment on Facebook

mother theresa was evil .... and since when as anyone been perfect .... as for god = fiction

Mother Theresa was none of that ... she was a heartless money grubber ... watching the sick and dying suffer without giving them any relief and pocketing huge sums of money donated that was supposed to be used to alleviate the suffering she gave no care about!!

Any thing you consume whether veg or non-veg without a strong desire to eat specifically does not acquire sanskaras for the individual.However ,it is desirable to eat veg as cooking veg does not involve killing of a life for the sake of eating and most vegetables give sober sanskaraas.

We the humans have our own scales to weigh others.But God has the real scale and knows who is right or who is wrong.Better not to criticize and stop taking other's head load on us when we have our own.

God in buddism?

The second you said..

Mother Theresa was involved in child trafficking

Zij doen meer dan je ooit kunnen bedenken...!

No one is perfect , not even god if he made man after his own image .

The Dalai Lama enjoying a laugh with his friend George Bush. His Holiness called George Bush, "a man of Peace."

venduti entrambi. Maria T. di C. aiutava gli ammalati " PSICOLOGICAMENTE " mentre i soldi delle offerte "mondiali" finivano nelle casse del Vaticano; Inoltre era complice nel traffico di bambini. Tutti sono corrotti i " VIVI " ... i non corrotti sono stati "atti fuori"

Hypocrites!

Mother Teresa was a monster

GREAT RESPECT FOR BOTH

The term spirituality has always been one that is vague, broad, and occasionally brings to mind visuals of freaks, like some skinny, fruity smelling vegan with wild hair who meditates all day and has a nose ring.

But I believe the term has been hijacked, and I’m here to claim it back!  That’s right, step aside you crazy yippy-hippies, and let the real spiritualists cut through.  Yes, I know that the concept of spirituality means many things to many people, and one’s person spirituality can be very different from that of someone else.  I get it.

Regardless, I’m tired of people touting The Secret and holding motivational touchy-feely events and telling you to be your best self in the name of spirituality.  Not that there is anything wrong with all of that, but it should be done under the name of self-help or psychology.  Spirituality is a word that should be reserved for those who are interested in exploring a planned design or higher power outside the realm of formal religion or man-made dogma.

Why do I care?  Because it’s confusing when I am trying to find articles or material on spirituality, that’s why!  (insert whiny voice here)  As someone who does alot of research on the topic in order to publish a blog on the same, it can often be a frustrating waste of time to thumb through irrelevant material.

Gun pointing at man typing on computer

I know I don’t own a patent on the word and it’s a free country and all, but let’s flip it around.  The word secular is defined as attitudes, events, or things that have no religious or spiritual basis.  So how would people like it if the word secular was wrongly used in situations where a God was discussed in general, but not necessarily by a specific name, i.e. Jesus, Allah, or Ram?  That would be incorrect, wouldn’t it?  Secularism is supposed to refrain from any kind of religious reference, even if it’s done in a generic way.  How would people like it if they participate in an event thinking it’s secular, and then hear spiritual or religious terms thrown about all day long?  You bet your spiffy speedos they would not.

In the same way, I believe the word spiritual should be NON-secular, and refer to someone who believes that there may be a planned design or higher power, but may not want to specifically follow the rituals of a particular religion.  That’s all.  It should not stolen and used for the idea of improving one’s own appearance or self in this life, if that’s all that one is pursuing.  Meditation for the sake of alleviating stress so one can be more productive in their current life is quite different than meditating for the sake of true, eternal enlightenment.

Now one can argue that charity starts at home and becoming a less disturbed, more calm individual leads to heightened spiritual states and knowledge.  That is true, but so does keeping a sound body and mind through exercise and taking vitamins.  That’s called nutrition and fitness, not spirituality.  A line needs to be drawn.  When one is not pursuing an activity that involves links to the great beyond or increased compassion and love for all sentient beings, when it is simply about one’s current self in one’s current incarnation, it should clearly be labeled as self-help.  A blog written by someone interested in hiking, nature walks, mindfulness, and stress techniques is more of a self-help blog, not a spiritual one.

I know many would disagree and I know there are alot of greys and overlapping areas that make it acceptable for one kind of spiritual to bleed into the other.  To me, veganism does involve true spirituality because it is the recognition that there is a suffering, loving soul in animals, not just humans.  It’s about greater awareness of others, not just one’s self, which to me is true spiritual enlightenment.  So it’s hard to define exactly what the boundaries of this word should be, and of course everyone’s perceptions vary.  

Therefore I know that my suggestion to more concisely define the term spirituality is simply my subjective and peevish wish and not going to actually happen and I’ve just wasted 20 minutes of my life writing this, as you have reading it.  But one can still put the idea out there in the universe, and hope that against all odds it may just sprout wings.  One never knows.

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Comment on Facebook

Spirituality to me means peace and tranquillity, a love of nature and all the little creatures we share this beautiful planet with. The majesty of the mountains and the sweeping pine forests and the turbulence of the oceans. The blue skies with little puffy clouds, the heat of the sun and the cool beauty of the moon and stars. Spirituality for me is feeling at one with the planet.

Living a spiritual life means simply to go forward with a compassionate heart and a strong mind. To not be responsible for causing any living being pain. Simple, but not easy.

When the heart, mind, soul and body are in agreeance, then we are on a spiritual path. Any one of the four out of balance, then we have an error and need to check what we are doing.

If you doesnt believe the existence of soul, isnt it irony to believe spirituality? Many people believe happiness is when you achive high spiritual level. But our happiness is affected by hormones and body biochemistry. Emotions and feelings exist only with bodily form. Even if soul exist, he is not a being with emotion.

I did research on secular spirituality, and I will say spirituality means connection beyond oneself. Almost all the secular sites I found had that word. From my perspective, connection can mean interacting, observing, understanding, or sharing with another, such as a community, nature, or the universe. The feeling of immersing deep in wonder of the beauty of our world understood by science, psychology, history and social research can be just as beautiful, if not more, than what the religious see. And more importantly, it's proven through rigorous investigation.

Spirituality is usually a way to behave to please God without beinbg part of any religion!

Spirituality is about the non-physical aspects of life. It is understanding there are things we don't understand and looking within for answers that words cannot properly describe. It is distinguished from religion in being free from dogma and customs that are woven into lessons on spirituality to keep it grounded which makes it more approachable and less accurate. Spirituality is the realization we are all one.

Spirituality literally and originally in many languages means the way of the mindful breath. from latin spiritus meaning breath, wind . Semitic rauchaia from ruch =breath, Amazigh tahawit from ahu =breath.nothing to do with the spooky higher powers youtu.be/rBu5AmrxWu4

Thank you for wasting my time. If you hadn't already known that each person using the word 'spirituality' has his/her own definition of the word you must be living under a rock. You said at the outset that you were going to define, which was the only reason I read it, and you failed to do so. Then you realised this yourself, admitted to it, but still posted this non-article. Why? Either give the definition or take it down and stop wasting people's time and making a fool of yourself.

Self realisation...

just remember god doesn't exist.

SPIRITUALITY & VEGANISM The righteous avoid and abhor harm to living beings, lies and slander. He speaks the truth and does not deceive others. He speaks words that bring about unity. VEGAN 🕉️ Endocannabinoid-System 🕉️ N a m a s t é

In the last posting, we took a closer look at the popular Eastern concept of Reincarnation, where a soul may be born again and again, in various sentient forms, trying to earn enough good Karma points and the wisdom to achieve MOKSHA, or liberation from the cycle of rebirth.  Reincarnation would offer an explanation for the numerous discrepancies we see in this world, like a cosmic checkbook being balanced.  (And as a nerdy financial planner by day, the idea of a balanced checkbook disproportionately excites me.)

However like any spiritual topic, the existence of Reincarnation is yet unproven and always very debatable.  In part 1 of this article, I pointed out four contradictions that could be cited to form a case against it – 1) an increasing human population, 2) the ongoing extinction of various species, 3) babies and children dying young, and 4) a potential endless cycle of Karma with repeated mistakes over many lifetimes.

As an annoyingly indecisive and single agnostic who can’t commit to a man, much less an existential belief, it’s no surprise that I have four COUNTER arguments that could be made in FAVOR of the plausibility of rebirth, such as:

1)  Child prodigies – We all know that child prodigies are these pre-pubescent geniuses who exhibit an absurd amount of talent which normally would be attributed to a lifetime of learning, practice, and experience.  Instead, these half-pints gallivant around the world with their adorable cherubic faces and freak the bejesus out of us with their unexplainable skills in composition, painting, math, memory, dance, chess, or overall learning.

True, Mozart was born into a musical family and could have been nurtured by his environment to develop his abilities at an early age.  And yes, sometimes prodigies have exhibited irregular neurological configurations that could account for their brilliance as well.  But not all cases can be explained by upbringing or biology or other such logic.  Is it possible that these are old souls carrying with them the knowledge of a past life into a new one?

2) Past life memories and regression – There are enough detailed anecdotes of past life regression and memories that – at least in my mind – cannot be fully disregarded.  There are many thundering Atheists I know and fear who will angrily swat away these “anecdotes or examples” because they have not been proven under laboratory conditions, with James Randi, blah blah blah million dollars, and all that jazz.

But on my end, I am open-minded to reading about the studies of a prominent psychiatrist like Dr. Ian Stevenson who spent a huge part of his career researching and documenting past life memories, especially in children.  In his interviews, children who were born with certain physical or mental issues were able to explain how they incurred those injuries in a past life, and their stories and details were astonishingly confirmed by the family of the deceased person in question, sometimes from another part of the world entirely.

Reincarnation Hierarchy

I also read with skeptic but respectful fascination the descriptions of past-life regression Dr. Brian Weiss had noted with his patients during sessions of hypnosis.  His book was riveting, although I’m not even sure I believe in hypnosis, much less going back to a past life while under its spell. Hypnosis stage shows I’ve seen on YouTube have me partially convinced – watching germophobe Howie Mandel shake hands on AGT was quite persuasive – but I’m not fully there yet.

Could Dr. Ian and Dr. Weiss be quacks looking to fool all of us with their “woo-woo” theories?  (insert magic finger gesture here)  Sure … no doubt … entirely possible … I give it 50-50 odds.  But I can’t snobbishly and utterly dismiss such meticulously documented cases outright.

3)  Energy cannot be destroyed – If there is indeed a consciousness or soul energy that we possess (see Is Free Will the Property of Soul Energy?) that has the same traditional properties as other energies, then it would continue to exist once the human form disintegrates.  Because energy can neither be created nor destroyed.  So if we do have something akin to soul energy, it cannot dissolve or disappear once we die.

Another property of energy is that it is the ability to transform from one type to another.  In fact, this transformation is constantly happening, electric energy powering a microwave generates heat energy to warm a cup of tea.  Laser light or solar energy can also generate heat.  Kinetic wind energy can propel a windmill and circle back to producing electricity.  (My caloric food energy could transform to kinetic if I would move instead of flopping on the couch after brunch.  Instead I store up alot of potential energy.  😊)

Couch potato potential aside, energy is hardly ever static.  So it seems logical that soul energy – if it exists – would transform from one sentient type to another, whether human soul energy, animal soul energy, ghostly soul energy, or other, thus involving a constant cycle of rebirth.

4)  The eternity of time – Even if the Angry Atheists are right and it turns out there is no intelligence or plan behind the design of the universe and we are simply random products of the Big Bang, it stands to reason that whatever caused us to be born here in the first place would cause us to eventually be born again.  It might take a billion or many-illion years for the same random chemical reactions to reoccur, but if time is infinite and there is no end to the universe, then the odds are that we will one day spontaneously reignite or regenerate again.  So we’re damned if we do and damned if we don’t – i.e. we’re probably going to be reborn whether there is a higher power or whether there isn’t one.  In one situation, we may be able to determine our next avatar through our own free will and karmic earnings, in the other, we’re flotsam periodically being reborn into jetsam.

This is why I am perpetually confused – there are too many arguments to be made for and against the idea of Reincarnation.  I know that one can dismiss these theories as far-fetched and involving hypothesis upon hypothesis – or a tower of turtles. We can also attempt to offer scientific explanations for certain phenomenon that don’t involve the supernatural.

But if it exists, Reincarnation would help make sense of the discrepancies we see in the world.  It might give more meaning or at least longevity value to the struggles we face if they teach us wisdom that can be carried with us to other lifetimes.  It might give those who are attached to this world and their human avatar hope that the party will go on in some shape or manner.

But to be honest, despite my inability to dismiss it completely, I would be perfectly okay with Reincarnation not existing.  In fact I would prefer it.  I don’t like parties – an eternal dreamless nap in its place doesn’t sound too bad to me.  I don’t want to come back.  And I am especially not keen on being reborn as the chickens I consume for lunch for my own selfish pleasure.  I would probably have alot of bad karma to burn off and need to start all the way at the bottom of the totem pole as a type of mold.  I don’t want to be a fungus.  I don’t want to live my best fungus life.

Uninspiring and depressing I know – its soooooo not OpraChopra – but to each their own.  On my end, I’m perfectly okay with this life being my first, last, or only.  I don’t need a do over.  Unless I could come back as George Clooney.  Or at least Bo Obama.  Then maybe I’d think about it.

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Comment on Facebook

We are Soul, divine units of consciousness. Atoms of God, in a sense, with the attributes of God within us. Our purpose, over our many lifetimes, is to recognize and manifest these God like qualities so that we can achieve God realization which is our destiny. Jesus did this. We are the "fallen angels" referred to in the bible. God created all the universes and tossed us down here to learn our lessons. We quite often started out in a plant or animal body, learning lessons in these bodies, although at a lower consciousness level than human. Then we move up to human bodies where we begin the purification process in earnest, struggling and suffering through many many lifetimes. We go to one of the lower heavens between lifetimes. These heavens are not of this physical plane but on adjacent parallel dimensions. Because we don't occupy these planes in our physical bodies.

it get s funnier each time a religious post comes on my feed ! If I'd said half of this I'd be put in a sanatorium!

There is no evidence of any supernatural or spiritual being. There is plenty evidence that primitive men who did not understand the world around them made this shit up. So sad that people still believe this crap and ignore the overwhelming science and history that show their stories to be bullshit.

No. Our kind of spirit only ever incarnates as human.

If you read in depth SCIENTIFIC review of bang theory you will understand the tremendous odds of creating ANY life. Therefore is it more rational to think the billion to one odd of male female zygote finding each other or a Devine being created us? Most people will not read a deep scientific analysis. They go for the synopsis. Chaotic evolution statistics can not possibly be true. There are many scientists who favor creation but grants are non existent to these men and women. True the is not lucrative. You can see this in the current gender debate. Scientificly there are two sexes anything else is a mental choice. The human form is in a three month embryo and it feels pain. There are many other scientific truths but we must READ, DIG, and cross check .

Just started your book. Very much enjoying it.

And she's buying a stairway to heaven...

There always seems to be one more rung of the ladder of success.

False prophets. There is no reincarnation. There are no different orbits. I know truth. I am happy to share it with others FOR FREE! Even to false prophets like yourself.

So, is the Sun Hell?

The Brothers Grimm had some pretty cool fairy tales too.

Read God Speaks by MeherBaba ,a book the biography of the soul from Nothing to Everything.

Thank god i'm an athiest

🤣

psycho..😱🤡

I have to admit, Reincarnation scares me as much as the prospect of having to give up carbs.  It’s frightening.

Now I wouldn’t mind being reborn as a movie star or even Paris Hilton’s spoiled pooch – talk about luxury!  But if I didn’t get to choose my avatar, I think the prospect of being randomly born again is spooky.  Who knows where I’d end up?

In some ways, I do think Reincarnation may be a possibility, otherwise how would one explain the discrepancies that seem to appear in one lifetime between the haves and the have nots?  Between the refugee and the billionaire? Between the healthy and the disabled?  Between a dying child and a 100 year old smoker?

Karma doesn’t seem to right itself in just one lifetime.  If it did, a certain orange narcissist would choke on his fast food.  So if there is a planned design to the universe, then it makes sense that Reincarnation would be part of that design and help smooth out these imbalances over time.

On the other hand, I often doubt its existence at all.  As logical a system as Reincarnation might seem for checks and balances amongst souls, it doesn’t seem to quite execute in a way that follows that same logic.  In other words, the idea of Reincarnation makes sense to me, but if I look around, our daily world seems to be a stark contradiction of it.  There are a few major reasons for my confusion:

1) Population Growth – the concept of Reincarnation, at least as explained by some Eastern religions, posits the idea that the soul has to go through a chain of plant and animal life forms before it can reach the human form, where it has its one chance to progress spiritually and achieve moksha (liberation from the cycle of rebirth). If the goal is not achieved, then the soul is sent back down the chain to start the climb again, from amoeba – to tumbleweed – to snake – to Joe the Plumber. Perhaps not all the way from the beginning, but from a point that reflects the spiritual wisdom it has attained and the good or bad karma it has earned. 

Hinduism puts estimates at 8.4 million life forms that need to be traversed before one finally reaches its human avatar. The human stage is said to be the main platform where a soul gets to further its spiritual progress due to its new ability to think beyond basic animal instincts. Human birth is considered the pinnacle of the earthly chain of Reincarnation and therefore the most precious and important life form we can achieve.

Reincarnation Hierarchy

If this were true, then how is it that the homo sapien population is increasing over time?  Instead our numbers should go up or down every year, i.e. sometimes there would be more of us and sometimes less, depending on how many souls happen to be passing through the top of the chain before falling back down again.  Why is the number simply going in one direction?

With billions of additional humans coming into the world every few decades, it implies new souls are being injected into the system – which doesn’t really make sense.  What are they doing in the meantime, waiting somewhere on a cosmic playground for their turn on the slide into our world?  The increasing population number seems to contradict the premise of Reincarnation.

2) Extinction – Similarly, the fact that certain species have gone extinct – dinosaurs, Tasmanian tigers, bipartisan politicians – doesn’t make sense either within a system of Reincarnation.  If each of us has to experience the same test as other souls – perhaps modified by our own good or bad karma points and earned trajectory – but still similar in structure – why would certain species, or tests go missing?  Shouldn’t all of us be going through the same life forms in order to experience the same challenges? 

Of course if one wanted to, one could conveniently theorize that the test remains the same no matter which life form we take on, and it doesn’t matter whether we’re a dinosaur or platypus, we still have to learn to pee in the forest.  But to me it seems that a Reincarnation exam room such as the world would be designed a little more consistently if an SST – Standardized Soul Test – was the goal.

Reincarnation Hierarchy

3)  Dying Young – A third contradiction I find is the death of children and babies.  I understand the possibility that certain life forms may be cut short because the work they were assigned is complete.  But if the human avatar is our most important one for intellectual and emotional growth, then what sense does it make for a baby to die after just a few days in the hospital intensive care?  What kind of spiritual growth could the poor thing have possibly attained in that blip of time?  If it had any bad karma to work off, the soul could have done it in another way, it seems vastly inefficient to be born human and leave so quickly.

4)  Endless cycle of Karma – And lastly, I don’t understand why a system was designed to almost force us to repeat our mistakes.  We supposedly take our spiritual growth with us as we progress through our journey, but there seems to be too much opportunity for us to generate more bad Karma for ourselves.  Because even if we bring some wisdom with us, surely we have to make SOME mistakes in our next human or sentient life in order to acquire new knowledge and wisdom?  We are not allowed to remember exactly what we did wrong in past lives, so it’s almost like a harried, hopeless hopscotch where we might take two steps back in order to move one step forward. (I was never good at hopscotch – butterscotch is more my thing.)

Why not just give us one lifetime in which to build upon our knowledge and experience and rid ourselves of any bad Karma in one efficient run?  Why create an inefficient, mysterious, complicated system like Reincarnation when there could be so many simpler paths instead?

I know there may be elaborate or far-fetched rebuttals that could be made to defend  these  contradictions.  There is no end to being able to confirm one’s own bias or blind faith if that is the goal.  But while I am always open to all conjectures, these specific points seem to greatly discredit Reincarnation and instead give support to Science and Evolution.

On the other hand, true to my wishy-washy agnostic nature, I do think there are other compelling arguments that could be made in favor of continual rebirth.  And not all of them are spiritual or theist in nature.  I’ll be sharing those counterpoints in my next posting.  

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Comment on Facebook

We are Soul, divine units of consciousness. Atoms of God, in a sense, with the attributes of God within us. Our purpose, over our many lifetimes, is to recognize and manifest these God like qualities so that we can achieve God realization which is our destiny. Jesus did this. We are the "fallen angels" referred to in the bible. God created all the universes and tossed us down here to learn our lessons. We quite often started out in a plant or animal body, learning lessons in these bodies, although at a lower consciousness level than human. Then we move up to human bodies where we begin the purification process in earnest, struggling and suffering through many many lifetimes. We go to one of the lower heavens between lifetimes. These heavens are not of this physical plane but on adjacent parallel dimensions. Because we don't occupy these planes in our physical bodies.

it get s funnier each time a religious post comes on my feed ! If I'd said half of this I'd be put in a sanatorium!

There is no evidence of any supernatural or spiritual being. There is plenty evidence that primitive men who did not understand the world around them made this shit up. So sad that people still believe this crap and ignore the overwhelming science and history that show their stories to be bullshit.

No. Our kind of spirit only ever incarnates as human.

If you read in depth SCIENTIFIC review of bang theory you will understand the tremendous odds of creating ANY life. Therefore is it more rational to think the billion to one odd of male female zygote finding each other or a Devine being created us? Most people will not read a deep scientific analysis. They go for the synopsis. Chaotic evolution statistics can not possibly be true. There are many scientists who favor creation but grants are non existent to these men and women. True the is not lucrative. You can see this in the current gender debate. Scientificly there are two sexes anything else is a mental choice. The human form is in a three month embryo and it feels pain. There are many other scientific truths but we must READ, DIG, and cross check .

Just started your book. Very much enjoying it.

And she's buying a stairway to heaven...

There always seems to be one more rung of the ladder of success.

False prophets. There is no reincarnation. There are no different orbits. I know truth. I am happy to share it with others FOR FREE! Even to false prophets like yourself.

So, is the Sun Hell?

The Brothers Grimm had some pretty cool fairy tales too.

Read God Speaks by MeherBaba ,a book the biography of the soul from Nothing to Everything.

Thank god i'm an athiest

🤣

psycho..😱🤡

BUT DO YOU HAVE PROOF?  – my Atheist friend screamed in my face for the 10th time as we were debating a spiritual topic – one that HE had brought up.  I almost felt like throwing my plate at his smug mug but resisted.  I still wanted to eat the cake that was on it.

Why do Atheists like engaging in spiritual discussions if they keep interrupting them with rabid demands for proof?  If you’ve ever come across a fanatical Atheist, and made it through without peeing your pants, you’ll be familiar with their loud and agitated denouncements of any type of theory or belief that cannot be studied in a lab or through science.

I understand their demands because in many ways I am a skeptic as well – my friends think I’m wishy-washy but my official term for myself is Agnostic.   I constantly swing from theism to atheism depending on my mood, the day, and how much caffeine I’ve chugged.  Similar to Atheists, I cannot accept theories based simply on blind faith and man-made dogma.  And I do have atheistic inclinations often, especially when I see the latest news and get disgusted at all the suffering and evil that always seems to be surrounding us.   Watching ISIS cruelly slit a person’s throat or an innocent child being abused causes me to violently rebel against the idea of a higher, loving power in existence. 

Cosmic Circumstantial Clues

But overall, if I had to place my chips, I would ultimately bet that there IS a planned design to the universe, and there IS a higher plane of existence – a happier place we can go when we pass on (one where chocolate has negative calories).  In general I believe that we have free will and therefore there is a reason for our existence.

And when questioned, here is how I try to explain my theistic leanings to my scary Atheist friends:

We might not have proof, but we may have circumstantial evidence.  In both QUANTITY and QUALITY.

WHAT IS CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE?
Circumstantial evidence is defined as indirect evidence that establishes a conclusion by inference or reasoning.  It is generally considered weaker and less valid than direct proof, though in many cases, it is still enough to convict someone of a crime.  For example, you may not have witnessed me stealthily eating your piece of cake too, but the frosting on my lips would be a strong indicator of guilt.  Circumstantial evidence plays a big role in our justice system.  In the case of Casey Anthony and OJ Simpson, there was not enough circumstantial evidence to prove a crime, but it was strong enough to lead many to believe that they were guilty.  It is not always possible to find the smoking gun, but there may be a sufficient number of indirect clues that add up to a specific conclusion.

In the case of my spiritual inclinations, I may not have conclusive evidence to support them, but they have been formed due to the cosmic circumstantial clues that seem to surround us.  I am referring to child prodigies, ghost sightings, NDE (near death experiences), past life memories, small miracles, ESP, and more.

Normally I am not a superstitious person.  If a mirror breaks, I figure my beauty was simply too breathtaking for it to behold.  In addition, I am not ruling out the possibility that all of these phenomenon are simply fake stories or concepts and that none of the above exists.  That could be so.

QUANTITY AND STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE
However, it’s hard to dismiss the statistical significance of SO many stories existing of supernatural phenomena.  Can they ALL be false?   It seems highly unlikely. Perhaps. But unlikely.  Maybe the idea of vampires or zombies or levitation or séances doesn’t resonate with me.  And I’m pretty sure the Easter Bunny isn’t real.  But I can’t dismiss everything.

Even if one idea is fake, and the next, and the next, surely one of the numerous supernatural stories we’ve heard is true?  After all there are hundreds of thousands of them over the centuries, from exorcisms to haunted houses to past life memories to child prodigies to mind reading to fortune telling.  I am sure there is a way to discount and ignore each story on its own – and indeed, none of them have ever been provable or measurable through repeatable, scientific measures.  But taken as a whole, and looked at from a macro perspective, surely there must be SOME FIRE with this much smoke? 

QUALTITY, CONSISTENCY, AND CREDIBILITY
Besides the sheer QUANTITY of supernatural stories in circulation, the QUALITY of some of those stories, as well as the storytellers, also seems to influence my beliefs.  The fact that so many NDEs exist with similar variables – a bright light, an intense feeling of love, a knowledge of one’s surrounding events even while the brain was supposedly dead – all these stories seem to match one another across time, geography, cultures, and people.  Like many skeptics, my first reaction is to dismiss such experiences as hallucinations.  But when thousands of NDE stories are so consistent in detail they seem more believable.

Child prodigies like Mozart did and do exist, and though we might argue that their upbringing and genetic makeup created their genius, not all child prodigies can have their unexplainable talents attributed to a nurturing environment.  One can’t completely dismiss the possibility that a wise, talented old soul may have been reincarnated into a new body.

Credible storytellers such as doctors and surgeons who swear they’ve seen unexplained miracles at play in the operating room, and former atheists turning deists due to some personal experience, also budge my needle from skepticism to belief.  The Scalpel and the Soul was written by a Harvard neurosurgeon who detailed various unexplainable experiences with his patients which he ultimately attributed to something not yet understood by science.  I’m not saying every medical or scientific professional is unquestionably certified as an author of such recountings – many could very well have cashed in on their reputations and schemed to make money with such books.  But they do lend weight to the growing pile of cosmic clues.

In my own personal experience, I’ll admit to being a little spooked when a friend of mine – who I’ve known to be a scientist and hard-core Atheist for most of her life – startled me a few years ago when I went to her new home for a housewarming party and she breathlessly swore that her last house was haunted.  She gave me several examples of incidents that had occurred.  I finally had to cut her off after hearing a few of them, I was scared I’d go home and not be able to sleep at night.  These creepy incidents were the main reason she had moved.   Astonishingly, she  is now open to the possibility of the supernatural.  I realize that none of you would know my friend and how surprising this was for me, but think of it as the equivalent of a Bill Maher or the former James Randi coming out of the closet and suddenly admitting they believe in a God or ghosts.

NO SMOKING GUN BUT COPIOUS COSMIC CLUES . . . 
As an Agnostic, my needle will never be at 0 (atheism) or 100 (theism).  But it does seem to waver between 30 and 80 depending on the latest I’ve heard or experienced.

It is hard to explain all this to a thundering, red-faced Atheist who is understandably angry at organized religion for all it may have done to foster wars, persecution, and suffering.  To them the burden of proof is on a Theist, not themselves.  And when concrete, indisputable proof is not forthcoming, it is not surprising that many turn away from any kind of belief in a planned design or higher power.

But for many of us Agnostics, we are open-minded and unable to dismiss the copious cosmic clues that surround us daily.  There are too many stories and storytellers who have described time and again, supernatural phenomenon that cannot be explained.  For many of us, there is enough circumstantial evidence to point to the likely conclusion that there is, indeed, a soul or consciousness or a better place we can go when we pass on.   And it is for this reason that I now talk nicely to the monsters under my bed – just in case they exist.

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Comment on Facebook

I think some of them are true but is it in the brain only or in the physical we don t know it even if we expérience it

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. If it exists, prove it using rigorous scientific methodology and peer review. Show me a credible collection of white papers and thesis on ghosts and I will happily reclassify Ghostbusters as non-fiction.

NONE are TRUE and never have been.

Rational people have better things to do than grant unwarranted credibility to every half-assed delusion.

True

Fake,everyone of them.

All life is ENERGY and we are transmitting it at every moment . . . like radio frequencies . . .       OPRAH WINFREY

I believe we’re a field of ENERGY, dancing for itself . . . clusters of tetrahedrons moving around together . . .       JIM CAREY

That annoying toddler is a tornado of ENERGY . . . can someone give him some Baby Nyquil?       ME

This is what many of us like to say when describing the essence of a human being – that we are “energy”.  It is very common to describe ourselves not as the physical form which we inhabit, but as that intangible force inside.

Although it’s a belief that’s been widely quoted, it’s rarely detailed. What if we were to examine the concept using more concrete, scientific parameters? After all, many forms of energy do exist – Heat, Light, Wind, Sound, Magnetic, Nuclear – is it possible that there is a sentient or conscious type of energy, and can it be explained or proven?

THE DEFINITION OF ENERGY
A logical place to begin our analysis would be the basic definition of energy.  Energy is generally described as:

A fundamental FORCE of nature that is transferred between parts of a SYSTEM resulting in some physical change to the system and usually regarded as the capacity for doing WORK.  Energy can take a wide variety of forms.

That’s a lot of fancy words, I did get straight A’s in science eons ago then promptly forgot everything as an adult.  So let’s translate that into something simpler.  As per the definition, let’s look at examples of some type of force, powering some type of system, to make it do some type of work.

Types of Energy and their Properties

These examples seem pretty straightforward, don’t they?   Physical systems such as televisions or vacuums are powered by some kind of force like Electricity in order to do work like broadcasting shows or cleaning our floors.

APPLYING IT TO SOUL ENERGY
So how can we take that formula and apply it to ourselves, and the belief that we are energy?  Well to begin with, the human body IS a physical system.  And we DO have scientifically recognized energy sources which power it, including Chemical – which we absorb from food, water, and air (I get most of mine from chocolate) – and Heat – which we may absorb from the sun or environment.  We have the ability to move, via Kinetic Energy. Gravitational Energy also plays a part (ergo, pushup bras and facelifts).  So we can see that the physical body itself is certainly driven by all sorts of energy.

But this is not the energy or work that we refer to when we talk about ourselves in the spiritual sense.  We may be using food and water to power our movements and keep us breathing, but it seems like there is some other type of energy that causes us to think, feel, and write brilliant articles.  To give it a proper name, let’s call it Soul Energy.  If we were to chart Soul Energy in the same table, it might look like this:

Is Free Will the property of Soul Energy?

Just like the property of Kinetic Energy is motion, and the property of Thermal Energy is heat, the property of Soul Energy – if it exists – might be defined as consciousness, or Free Will.  It could be the missing link that separates a sentient being from an inanimate object.  Wind Energy can blow a rock down a mountain, Heat Energy can melt an ice glacier.  These types of energy are passive, and these types of physical systems are non-sentient.  But Soul Energy – if there is such a thing – may be the reason a sentient being can actively determine their own movements, experience emotions, and create a set of values and ethics.

THOSE WHO DISAGREE
Many people, one being Sam Harris, have argued that there is no such thing as Free Will and it is only due to genetic programming or environmental cues that we act the way we do.  In other words, like a billiard ball that might bounce off other balls and walls before it arrives at its destination on a pool table, we simply react to whatever stimulus is presented to us in a mechanical manner and arrive passively at our various milestones in life.  There is no choice according to non-believers of Free Will, anyone presented with the same set of circumstances and the same societal upbringing would exhibit the same exact behaviors.  

I don’t completely understand this argument, because in his book titled Free Will, Sam Harris does not do a convincing job explaining why criminals should not be held accountable for their crimes if they have no choice in the matter. 

Some of his ideas were interesting nonetheless and because we have not yet found a way to capture and document Soul Energy, I understand there will always be those who refuse to consider it a possibility.  But having only recently discovered Nuclear and Atomic Energy in the past 100 years, there is no telling what other types of energy may exist of which we are not yet aware.  Mankind is not omniscient, we are constantly making scientific discoveries that only decades ago were completely unknown.

THE CASE FOR FREE WILL
Even without definitive evidence or the smoking gun, sometimes there are enough clues that point us to a more likely direction.  Numerous stories of Near Death Experiences (NDEs) hint at the possibility of a consciousness existing outside of the regular chemical functions of our bodies.  Child Prodigies give glimpses into the different personalities and skills we may bring with us into the womb, perhaps from another life.  Ghosts – if they exist – may be evidence of our Soul Energy existing past the barriers of our physical forms.

But the clue most difficult to dismiss in the whole argument for Free Will is one’s own experiences.  Even the most skeptical amongst us can’t fully ignore the innate feeling that there IS something inside of us making choices on a daily basis, a process that involves wisdom, principles, and subjectivity.  When we look back at decisions such as what to eat for lunch or who to marry, many of us simply can’t believe that it was an artificial, robotic process that drove us.

Scientists can show what happens when we are in the process of making decisions in terms of synapses firing, but what is it that is causing the decision to be made in the first place?  It seems unattributable to simple biology or chemistry, especially when no two sentient beings think alike. Don’t get me wrong, I’d LOVE to blame my sugar addiction on my DNA, but I suspect there is more to it.

So are we powered by another type of energy, one that is not just passive Chemical and Heat?  We may never know for sure.  But it’s hard to ignore the countless circumstantial clues that hint at a driving force inside that is more sentient and unique – one that we might call Soul Energy, with the accompanying property of Free Will.

Let’s hope the future brings a day soon when we can finally capture, measure, and discover it!

Energy is Defined as a Force that does Work
Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

Comment on Facebook

Yes, the Soul is the spirit not the physical body. The soul is the pattern and the epitome of force. Beyond physical energy that keeps the flesh alive.

As for free will this is a very difficult question. The best answer I've seen (in favor of free will) is from Immanuel Kant, which my understanding was that the only way to have free will is to make a decision before being faced with it. Once you are at that moment everything before it which led to the circumstances of making that decision will lead to a specific decisit everytime. There are some potential paradoxical loops but I think the key is that we are able to have a degree of free will but it is much more limited than we would like to imagine.

Soul IS a divine unit of spiritual energy, of consciousness. And we do have free will. That's why so many people screw up because they're not listening to the subtle messages from their divine selves, they're listening instead to the human self.

This is a quasi-scientific explanation using scientific terms mixed with more collocial ideas. "Wind energy" is kinetic energy. Trying to equate the or a soul with tangible forces is probably the wrong direction. I believe the soul exists, it is not measurable (at least not with current technology) but it is real. If you are to examine an organism the moment before and the moment after death it would be identical from a measurable manner, the difference is soul or life force or whatever word we use to inadequately describe it. I say organism instead of person as humans have created measurable definitions for death for legal and insurance purposes, but I am trying to point out something which is less than a millisecond of duration the time immediately before and after death. I think there is a good point trying to be made here, but by structuring it in a scientific manner when it is not a scientific idea (observable and repeatable) it casts a shadow on the light trying to be shined.

the human body runs on chemical and electrical energy. sorry, not sorry.

Thought is driven by chemical and electrical processes. Disrupt those processes and thought is disrupted. Remove those processes and thought ceases (death or vegetative state). Even things that are believed to be spiritually uplifting (prayer, meditation, etc) tend to stimulate chemical activity in the brain by triggering the release of various hormones or neurotransmitters.

"Every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe-a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble." Albert Einstein Artwork - "The Magic of Trivial illusions" by Michael Cheval

Energy is not a force. When a force acts on an object over some distance, it does work on that object, causing it to gain energy (e.g. kinetic (motion) or potential (stored) energy). In terms of the units of measurement, therefore, energy = force x distance. Force and energy are not the same thing.

This is perfection.

Erwin Schrodinger and Max Planck were founders of Quantum Mechanics the most successful theory in the history of science. They both believed that consciousness was a fundamental part of the universe not dependent on anything else like energy, space and time.

No soul energy, science says there is no soul. Yes, we have free will, because there is no god overseeing us. Want to prove otherwise? Have your god say Hi.

"Is there such a thing as Soul Energy and Free Will?" No and yes. Next?

🤣

no

I have to ask: Is that "chart" based on your ignorance about science, or your willingness to lie about science to try to validate your belief? My guess is that you are both ignorant and a liar.

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to our newsletter to get the latest content delivered to your inbox.  

(NOTE:  We hate spam and will never sell your email!)